Thursday, December 6, 2007

Review Roundup II

Fairbanks v. Superior Court (S157001)

When I wrote about this decision I praised it for its thoroughness. It was an issue of first impression but I found the Court of Appeal's four-part statutory interpretation very persuasive. I predicted that the Court of Appeal had resolved forever the question of whether insurance is covered by the Consumer Legal Remedies Act (CLRA). I was wrong.

On Nov. 14, the Supreme Court granted review on that very question.

No comments: